Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Prosthodontic Resear...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Prosthodontic Research & Practice
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Surface Analysis of Keepers on Dental Magnetic Attachments : Comparison of Cast-Bonding Technique and Direct-Bonding Technique

Authors: Yuko Suminaga; Fujio Tsuchida; Norio Takishin; Toshio Hosoi; Koichi Sugiyama;

Surface Analysis of Keepers on Dental Magnetic Attachments : Comparison of Cast-Bonding Technique and Direct-Bonding Technique

Abstract

Purpose : To obtain maximum attractive force for magnetic attachments, the degree of flatness of the keeper surface is very important. This study evaluated the flatness of keeper surfaces fabricated on copings using the cast-bonding and the direct-bonding techniques.Materials and Methods : Specimens were made with keepers from the Hyper Slim 3513 magnetic attachment system (Hitachi Metals, Tokyo, Japan) using both the cast-bonding and the direct-bonding techniques. In the cast-bonding technique, the coping with the keeper was waxed up and cast according to conventional laboratory procedures. In the direct-bonding technique, the keeper was cemented on the cast housing with resin cement. The 3-dimensional shape of the keepers was measured using non-contact laser beam equipment (NH-4N, Mitaka Kohki, Tokyo, Japan), and the flatness was statistically analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test at a significance level of α=0.05.Results : The keepers fabricated with the cast-bonding technique had a convex curvature, whereas the direct-bonding technique produced a flatter keeper surface. There was a significant difference (p<0.01) in the flatness between the two techniques.Conclusion : The direct-bonding keepers were significantly flatter than the cast-bonding keepers, whose surfaces bulged in the center. The direct-bonding technique thus allowed optimal retentive force for the magnetic attachment.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze