
doi: 10.2186/jjps.33.517
pmid: 2489711
The following results were obtained from studying the removability of 53 removable partial dentures. 1. All of their retentive forces were less than 2,000 gf. 2. In 5 out of 31 dentures whose retentive forces were graded D2 and less, the wearers could remove the dentures easily without help of their fingers. Out of 22 dentures graded D4 and more, 3 conic dentures were difficult in removal. 3. The wearers were dissatisfied with 3 dentures graded D2 and less, and with 2 conic dentures graded D4. 4. In 12 dentures graded D1, 9 dentures were evaluated to be too loose by the operators. In 12 dentures graded D4 and more, 2 conic dentures were evaluated to be too tight by both the wearers and the operators. 5. All conic dentures complained had 4-degree-tapered conic studs as the retainer. 6. It is considered that in terms of subjective evaluations, an adequate retentive force for the dentures might be in the range from 800 gf to 2,000 gf.
Denture, Partial, Removable, Humans, Consumer Behavior, Denture Retention
Denture, Partial, Removable, Humans, Consumer Behavior, Denture Retention
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
