
doi: 10.2172/236258
A review and summary of the available information on steam generator tubing failures and the impact of these failures on plant safety is presented. The following topics are covered: pressurized water reactor (PWR), Canadian deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactor, and Russian water moderated, water cooled energy reactor (VVER) steam generator degradation, PWR steam generator tube ruptures, the thermal-hydraulic response of a PWR plant with a faulted steam generator, the risk significance of steam generator tube rupture accidents, tubing inspection requirements and fitness-for-service criteria in various countries, and defect detection reliability and sizing accuracy. A significant number of steam generator tubes are defective and are removed from service or repaired each year. This wide spread damage has been caused by many diverse degradation mechanisms, some of which are difficult to detect and predict. In addition, spontaneous tube ruptures have occurred at the rate of about one every 2 years over the last 20 years, and incipient tube ruptures (tube failures usually identified with leak detection monitors just before rupture) have been occurring at the rate of about one per year. These ruptures have caused complex plant transients which have not always been easy for the reactor operators to control. Our analysis shows that if more than 15 tubes rupture during a main steam line break, the system response could lead to core melting. Although spontaneous and induced steam generator tube ruptures are small contributors to the total core damage frequency calculated in probabilistic risk assessments, they are risk significant because the radionuclides are likely to bypass the reactor containment building. The frequency of steam generator tube ruptures can be significantly reduced through appropriate and timely inspections and repairs or removal from service.
Nondestructive Testing, North Anna-1 Reactor, Tubes, 21 Nuclear Power Reactors And Associated Plants, Doel-2 Reactor, Failures, Pwr Type Reactors, Candu Type Reactors, In-Service Inspection, Mc Guire-1 Reactor, Ginna-1 Reactor, Prairie Island-1 Reactor, Palo Verde-2 Reactor, Risk Assessment, Steam Generators, 620, Point Beach-2 Reactor, Calhoun-1 Reactor, Service Life, Mihama-1 Reactor, Surry-2 Reactor, Wwer Type Reactors
Nondestructive Testing, North Anna-1 Reactor, Tubes, 21 Nuclear Power Reactors And Associated Plants, Doel-2 Reactor, Failures, Pwr Type Reactors, Candu Type Reactors, In-Service Inspection, Mc Guire-1 Reactor, Ginna-1 Reactor, Prairie Island-1 Reactor, Palo Verde-2 Reactor, Risk Assessment, Steam Generators, 620, Point Beach-2 Reactor, Calhoun-1 Reactor, Service Life, Mihama-1 Reactor, Surry-2 Reactor, Wwer Type Reactors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
