
doi: 10.2172/10124744
This is the ninth Technical Progress Report, describing work performed under DOE Contract No. (DE-FC2290PC896631) ``Development of a Coal Quality Expert.`` The contract is a Cooperative Agreement between the US Department of Energy, CQ Inc., and ABB Combustion Engineering, Inc. This report covers the period from April 1, through June 30, 1992. Four companies and seven host utilities have teamed with CQ Inc. and ABB/CE to perform the work on this project. The work falls under DOE`s Clean Coal Technology Program category of ``Advanced Coal Cleaning.`` The 45-month project will provide the utility industry with a PC expert system to confidently and inexpensively evaluate the potential for coal cleaning blending, and switching options to reduce emissions while producing lowest cost electricity. Specifically, this project will: (1) Enhance the existing Coal Quality Information System (CQIS) database and. Coal Quality Impact Model (CQIM) to allow confident assessment of the effects of cleaning on specific boiler cost and performance. (2) Develop and validate a methodology, Coal Quality Expert (CQE) which allows accurate and detailed predictions of coal quality impacts on total power plant capital cost, operating cost, and performance based upon inputs from inexpensive bench-scale tests.
Quality Control, 20 Fossil-Fueled Power Plants, Ash Content, And Peat, Progress Report, Data Base Management, Cost, 010300, Calorific Value, Power Generation, Chemical Composition, Fuels, 01 Coal, Properties And Composition, Coal, Mixing, Information 200108, Fossil-Fuel Power Plants, Preparation, Sulfur Content, 010600, Lignite, Coal Preparation
Quality Control, 20 Fossil-Fueled Power Plants, Ash Content, And Peat, Progress Report, Data Base Management, Cost, 010300, Calorific Value, Power Generation, Chemical Composition, Fuels, 01 Coal, Properties And Composition, Coal, Mixing, Information 200108, Fossil-Fuel Power Plants, Preparation, Sulfur Content, 010600, Lignite, Coal Preparation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
