Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Ágora Revista Cientí...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Ágora Revista Científica
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Riesgo familiar total durante la pandemia por coronavirus en familias que reciben asistencia alimentaria en Carabayllo

Authors: Maria Vanessa Guzman Cuadros;

Riesgo familiar total durante la pandemia por coronavirus en familias que reciben asistencia alimentaria en Carabayllo

Abstract

Objetivos: Determinar el riesgo familiar total durante la pandemia por coronavirus en familias que reciben asistencia alimentaria en Carabayllo. Materiales y métodos: El enfoque fue cuantitativo y el diseño descriptivo-transversal. La población estuvo conformada por 336 integrantes de familias que reciben asistencia alimentaria durante la pandemia COVID-19. Se empleó el cuestionario Riesgo Familiar Total (RFT 5:33), que consta de 33 ítems y 5 dimensiones. Resultados: En cuanto al riesgo familiar total, 61,6% (n=207) de las familias tenían un riesgo bajo, seguido de 23,8% (n=80) de familias amenazadas y 14,6% (n=49) de familias con riesgo alto. En cuanto a las dimensiones, en condiciones psicoafectivas, el 87,8% (n=295) fueron familias amenazadas, seguido de 12,2% (n=41) de familias con riesgo alto; en servicios y prácticas de salud, el 81,3% (n=273) eran familias amenazadas, seguido de 18,8% (n=63) de familias con riesgo alto; en condiciones de vivienda y vecindario, un 87,2% (n=293) eran familias amenazadas, seguido de 12,8% (n=43) de familias con riesgo alto; en situación socioeconómica, un 73,8% (n=248) eran familias amenazadas, seguido de 26,2% (n=88) de familias con riesgo alto; finalmente, en manejo de menores, el 87,5% (n=294) eran familias amenazadas, seguido de 12,5% (n=42) de familias con riesgo alto. Conclusiones: En cuanto al riesgo familiar total, predomino las familias con riesgo bajo, seguido de amenazadas y riesgo alto. En relación a las dimensiones, en todas predominaron las familias amenazadas.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold