Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ المجلة العلمیة لقطاع...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

MEASURING THE COST FOR SOME SINGLE CHANNEL WAITING LINE MODELS

Authors: Doaa Ahmed Ali;

MEASURING THE COST FOR SOME SINGLE CHANNEL WAITING LINE MODELS

Abstract

Queuing theory or waiting line models are basically a mathematical approach applied to theanalysis of waiting lines. Most queuing models applications are centered on the question of findingthe ideal level of services, waiting times and queue lengths. When an organization retain an excellentcustomer service. The customers are kept happy or satisfaction but for the an organization becomeexpensive. Most managers recognize the trade – off that must take place between the cost ofproviding good service and the cost of customer waiting time. The objective of this study is tomeasure the cost for three single channel waiting line models. The aim of this study is to comparebetween three single channel waiting line models. The cost for the three single channel waiting linemodels is calculated with different distributions. The study results showed that the cost whichcalculated for the (M/D/1) model is less than the other two models when the same data are used.Second the results showed that the cost which calculated for the (M/G/1) model when the servicerate (μ) is followed weibull distribution is less than the same model when the service rate (μ) isfollowed exponential and gamma distributions.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze