Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Clinical Ophthalmolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Clinical Ophthalmology
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Dove Medical Press
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Dove Medical Press
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Long-Term Outcomes of Combined Phacoemulsification and Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy versus Standalone Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy

Authors: Khaled Safadi; Gustavo Gutierrez Vargas; Yaacov Cnaany; Shoham Kubovsky; Wiessam Abu Ahmad; Gabriel Greifner;

Long-Term Outcomes of Combined Phacoemulsification and Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy versus Standalone Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy

Abstract

Khaled Safadi,1 Gustavo Adolfo Gutierrez Vargas,1 Yaacov Cnaany,1 Shoham Kubovsky,1 Wiessam Abu Ahmad,2,3 Gabriel Greifner1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; 2Braun School of Public Health, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; 3Branch of Planning and Strategy, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, IsraelCorrespondence: Khaled Safadi, Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel, Email Khaled.Safadi@mail.huji.ac.ilPurpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of combined phacoemulsification and non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (Phaco-NPDS) with standalone NPDS in a large glaucoma cohort with long-term follow-up.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included eyes that underwent primary NPDS with or without phacoemulsification between 2013 and 2018, with follow-up through 2023. Eyes were grouped as Phaco-NPDS, NPDS-IOL, or NPDS-Phakic. Procedure selection reflected clinical decision-making (primarily lens status/cataract, age, and visual acuity). The primary outcome was surgical success. Success was defined as postoperative IOP 5– 21 mmHg with a ≥ 20% reduction from baseline at each follow-up. Complete success required no hypotensive medications, whereas qualified success was defined with or without hypotensive medications. Success was also assessed using stricter IOP upper limits (≤ 18, ≤ 15, and ≤ 12 mmHg). Secondary outcomes included visual acuity (VA), IOP, medication use, postoperative procedures, and complications.Results: A total of 276 eyes from 242 patients were included (mean age 71.7± 14.9 years; follow-up 4.25± 2.4 years). Qualified and complete success rates (IOP 5– 21 mmHg) were 78.1% and 69.2% in Phaco-NPDS, 79.0% and 68.0% in NPDS-IOL, and 83.4% and 73.3% in NPDS-Phakic, with no significant between-group differences (qualified p=0.46; complete p=0.16). Cox regression showed better complete, but not qualified, success in young phakic eyes without cataract undergoing standalone NPDS compared with Phaco-NPDS. Postoperative mean VA, IOP, and medication use were similar across groups. GPT and needling were more common during the first postoperative year, particularly in the NPDS-IOL group (OR=1.55 and 1.70, respectively). Post-GPT iris incarceration was the most frequent complication (10.5%).Conclusion: Combining phacoemulsification with NPDS was not associated with reduced surgical success. Phaco-NPDS should be considered for patients with coexisting cataract and uncontrolled glaucoma when surgical intervention is indicated. In young phakic eyes without cataract, standalone NPDS may be considered to achieve higher complete success at stricter IOP targets.Keywords: glaucoma, non-penetrating deep sclerectomy, intra-ocular pressure, cataract, phacoemulsification

Keywords

Clinical Ophthalmology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold