Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Inflammat...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Inflammation Research
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Conference object . 2025
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Dove Medical Press
Review . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Dove Medical Press
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Corynebacterium Striatum Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review

Authors: Minghuan Hong; Wei Xiang; Lingyun Kong; Xiujuan Wang; Li Fu; Lingling Chen; Fang Liu;

Corynebacterium Striatum Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Corynebacterium striatum (CS) is an uncommon but potentially fatal pathogen of infective endocarditis (IE). The literature on the patterns and clinical progression of Corynebacterium striatum infective endocarditis (CSIE) is limited. This article aims to provide insights into the clinical presentation and management of CSIE through a retrospective analysis of documented cases.An electronic search was conducted across various databases including PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang database to identify relevant articles in both English and Chinese literature documenting CSIE. Subsequently, patient-level data were extracted and subjected to analysis.The systematic search yielded 38 patients from 35 articles. The median age was 68 [IQR 54, 73] years, and 63.2% of patients were men. A history of heart disease was present in 55.3% of cases, while 15.8% had a history of cardiovascular electronic device implantation. The mitral valve was the most commonly affected site, accounting for 52.8%. The misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis rate of CSIE was 28.9%. Microbiological confirmation by 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (16S rRNA) or metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was present in 13.2% of cases. Vancomycin was the most effective antibiotic, with 41.7% of the CS isolates showing resistance to multiple drugs. Surgical intervention was performed in 55.3% of the CSIE patients, and the overall fatality rate was 37.8%, both of which were higher than those reported in standard IE due to common pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (surgical intervention rate 37.8%, fatality rate 22.4%) and viridans streptococci (surgical intervention rate 29.5%, fatality rate 36.6%).CSIE often presents with nonspecific symptoms, making it prone to misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. Echocardiography and blood cultures remain the primary diagnostic tools, but advanced approaches such as 16S rRNA and mNGS improve accuracy in pathogen identification. Compared to IE caused by common microorganisms (eg, Staphylococcus aureus, viridans streptococci), CSIE is associated with higher rates of surgical intervention and mortality, underscoring the urgent need for increased clinical vigilance and prompt, targeted management.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Review, Journal of Inflammation Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold