
doi: 10.2147/ijn.s382212
Wang M, Bhardwaj G, Webster TJ. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:6471–6476. An error during the preparation of Figure 6 for publishing led to the inadvertent creation of duplicate features in the PEEK image and alterations in the PEKK image on page 6475. The journal wishes to apologise for these errors. The correct version of Figure 6 is shown in Download Article. Read the original article
Medicine (General), peek, R5-920, International Journal of Nanomedicine, pekk, orthopedic, Erratum, bacteria, infection
Medicine (General), peek, R5-920, International Journal of Nanomedicine, pekk, orthopedic, Erratum, bacteria, infection
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
