
doi: 10.2147/ijn.s322675
Wang M, Bhardwaj G, Webster TJ. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:6471–6476. The authors have advised Figure 7 on page 6475 is incorrect. The authors inadvertently included a duplicate image for the live/dead Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PEEK samples shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. The correct Figure 7 is shown below. Read the original article
International Journal of Nanomedicine, Corrigendum
International Journal of Nanomedicine, Corrigendum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
