
Nanotechnology is an exciting field of investigation for the development of new treatments for many human diseases. However, it is necessary to assess the biocompatibility of nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo before considering clinical applications. Our characterization of polyol-produced maghemite γ-Fe(2)O(3) nanoparticles showed high structural quality. The particles showed a homogeneous spherical size around 10 nm and could form aggregates depending on the dispersion conditions. Such nanoparticles were efficiently taken up in vitro by human endothelial cells, which represent the first biological barrier to nanoparticles in vivo. However, γ-Fe(2)O(3) can cause cell death within 24 hours of exposure, most likely through oxidative stress. Further in vivo exploration suggests that although γ-Fe(2)O(3) nanoparticles are rapidly cleared through the urine, they can lead to toxicity in the liver, kidneys and lungs, while the brain and heart remain unaffected. In conclusion, γ-Fe(2)O(3) could exhibit harmful properties and therefore surface coating, cellular targeting, and local exposure should be considered before developing clinical applications.
Analysis of Variance, Cell Survival, Histocytochemistry, Intracellular Space, Endothelial Cells, Biocompatible Materials, Ferric Compounds, Rats, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Materials Testing, Animals, Humans, Tissue Distribution, Particle Size, Magnetite Nanoparticles, Original Research, Cell Line, Transformed
Analysis of Variance, Cell Survival, Histocytochemistry, Intracellular Space, Endothelial Cells, Biocompatible Materials, Ferric Compounds, Rats, International Journal of Nanomedicine, Materials Testing, Animals, Humans, Tissue Distribution, Particle Size, Magnetite Nanoparticles, Original Research, Cell Line, Transformed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 148 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
