Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Infection and Drug R...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Infection and Drug Resistance
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Infection and Drug Resistance
Article . 2022
Data sources: DOAJ
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Dove Medical Press
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Dove Medical Press
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Detection of NDM Variants (blaNDM-1, blaNDM-2, blaNDM-3) from Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: First Report from Nepal

Authors: Anisha Thapa; Milan Kumar Upreti; Nabin Kishor Bimali; Basudha Shrestha; Anil Kumar Sah; Krishus Nepal; Binod Dhungel; +4 Authors

Detection of NDM Variants (blaNDM-1, blaNDM-2, blaNDM-3) from Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: First Report from Nepal

Abstract

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance among Enterobacterales is attributable to their ability to produce carbapenemase enzymes like metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), and OXA-type. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of carbapenemases and MBL genes ((bla NDM-1, bla NDM-1 and bla NDM-3) among E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates.A total of 2474 urine samples collected during the study period (July-December 2017) were processed at the microbiology laboratory of Kathmandu Model Hospital, Kathmandu. Isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were processed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by disc diffusion method. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were subjected to Modified Hodge Test (MHT) for phenotypic confirmation, and inhibitor-based combined disc tests for the differentiation of carbapenemase (MBL and KPC). MBL-producing isolates were screened for NDM genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Of the total urine samples processed, 19.5% (483/2474) showed the bacterial growth. E. coli (72.6%; 351/483) was the predominant isolate followed by K. pneumoniae (12.6%; 61/483). In AST, 4.4% (18/412) isolates of E. coli (15/351) and K. pneumonia (3/61) showed resistance towards carbapenems, while 1.7% (7/412) of the isolates was confirmed as carbapenem-resistant in MHT. In this study, all (3/3) the isolates of K. pneumoniae were KPC-producers, whereas 66.7% (10/15), 20% (3/15) and 13.3% (2/15) of the E. coli isolates were MBL, KPC and MBL/KPC (both)-producers, respectively. In PCR assay, 80% (8/10), 90% (9/10) and 100% (10/10) of the isolates were positive for bla NDM-1, bla NDM-2 and bla NDM-3, respectively.Presence of NDM genes among carbapenemase-producing isolates is indicative of potential spread of drug-resistant variants. This study recommends the implementation of molecular diagnostic facilities in clinical settings for proper infection control, which can optimize the treatment therapies, and curb the emergence and spread of drug-resistant pathogens.

Keywords

Infection and Drug Resistance, ndm variants, mbl. kpc, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, k. pneumoniae, e. coli, Original Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
gold