
We show that, in addition to the counting of canonical dimensions, a counting of loop orders is necessary to fully specify the power counting of Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). Using concrete examples, we demonstrate that considering the canonical dimensions of operators alone may lead to inconsistent results. The counting of both, canonical dimensions and loop orders, establishes a clear hierarchy of the terms in SMEFT. In practice, this serves to identify, and focus on, the potentially dominating effects in any given high-energy process in a meaningful way. Additionally, this will lead to a consistent limitation of free parameters in SMEFT applications.
Physics, QC1-999, ddc:530, Quantum field theory; related classical field theories, 150, FOS: Physical sciences, Applications of quantum theory to specific physical systems, 530, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), Groups and algebras in quantum theory, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/530
Physics, QC1-999, ddc:530, Quantum field theory; related classical field theories, 150, FOS: Physical sciences, Applications of quantum theory to specific physical systems, 530, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph), Groups and algebras in quantum theory, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/530
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
