
doi: 10.2144/98252st02
pmid: 9714881
Various approaches can now be taken for amplification of RNA transcripts using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Here, we compare three such methods: (i) uncoupled reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (using separate reactions for cDNA synthesis and PCR), (ii) continuous RT-PCR (in which RT and DNA amplification occur in an uninterrupted reaction) using either a single enzyme for both RT and DNA amplification or (iii) using two enzymes, one for each task. We have found that the continuous two-enzyme RT-PCR method is the most sensitive, followed by the uncoupled RT-PCR and then the continuous single-enzyme method. The continuous methods require less sample handling than the uncoupled method, and hence are less labor-intensive and less prone to contamination. The continuous single-enzyme method is the most expensive to perform in terms of reagents due to the quantity of DNA polymerase required; however, it does have advantages over the two enzyme methods in that the use of a thermostable enzyme for RT can alleviate certain problems by allowing RT to occur at higher temperatures than those tolerable by viral reverse transcriptases.
Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, QH301-705.5, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reproducibility of Results, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, RNA, Neoplasm, Biology (General), Melanoma
Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, QH301-705.5, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reproducibility of Results, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Humans, RNA, Neoplasm, Biology (General), Melanoma
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
