
doi: 10.2144/04373st04
pmid: 15470894
The recent development of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) has provided an efficient and reliable assay for dosage screening of multiple loci in a single reaction. However, a drawback to this method is the time-consuming process of generating a probe set by cloning in single-stranded bacteriophage vectors. We have developed a synthetic probe set to screen for deletions in a region spanning 18.5 Mb within chromosome 3q. In a pilot study, we tested 15 synthetic probes on 4 control samples and on 2 patients previously found to possess a heterozygous deletion in the region 3q26-q28. These synthetic probes detected deletions at all previously known deleted loci. Furthermore, using synthetic probes, the variability of results within samples was similar to that reported for commercially available M13-derived probes. Our results demonstrate that this novel approach to MLPA provides a generic solution to the difficulties of probe development by cloning; such synthetically generated probes may be used to screen a large number of loci in a single reaction. We conclude that the use of synthetic probes for MLPA is a rapid, robust, and efficient alternative for research (and potentially diagnostic) deletion and duplication screening of multiple genomic loci.
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1300/1300, QH301-705.5, DNA Mutational Analysis, Gene Dosage, 610, name=Biotechnology, name=General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology, Biology (General), Chromosome Deletion, DNA Probes, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1300/1305
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1300/1300, QH301-705.5, DNA Mutational Analysis, Gene Dosage, 610, name=Biotechnology, name=General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology, Biology (General), Chromosome Deletion, DNA Probes, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1300/1305
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 75 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
