
arXiv: 1604.08852
Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) has already been applied to learn speaker characterizations from single or non-simultaneous speech for speaker recognition applications. It is also known for its good performance in (blind) source separation for simultaneous speech. This paper explains how NMF can be used to jointly solve the two problems in a multichannel speaker recognizer for simultaneous speech. It is shown how state-of-the-art multichannel NMF for blind source separation can be easily extended to incorporate speaker recognition. Experiments on the CHiME corpus show that this method outperforms the sequential approach of first applying source separation, followed by speaker recognition that uses state-of-the-art i-vector techniques.
Submitted to INTERSPEECH2016. 4 pages, 1 extra page for references
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Technology, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Sound (cs.SD), cs.LG, Social Sciences, PSI_SPEECH, Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Sound, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Engineering, multichannel, VERIFICATION, PSI_4102, NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION, Science & Technology, speaker recognition, Engineering, Electrical & Electronic, Linguistics, Acoustics, non-negative dmatrix factorization, AUDIO SOURCE SEPARATION, cs.SD, Computer Science, source separation
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Technology, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Sound (cs.SD), cs.LG, Social Sciences, PSI_SPEECH, Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Sound, Machine Learning (cs.LG), Engineering, multichannel, VERIFICATION, PSI_4102, NONNEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION, Science & Technology, speaker recognition, Engineering, Electrical & Electronic, Linguistics, Acoustics, non-negative dmatrix factorization, AUDIO SOURCE SEPARATION, cs.SD, Computer Science, source separation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
