
Processing noisy signals using the ideal binary mask has been shown to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance. In this paper, we present the first study that investigates the role of mask patterns in ASR under varying signalto-noise ratios (SNR), noise conditions and mask definitions. Binary masks are typically computed either by comparing the local SNR within a time-frequency unit of a mixture signal with a threshold termed the local criterion (LC), or by comparing the local target energy with the long-term average energy of speech. Results show that: (i) Akin to human speech recognition, binary masking can significantly improve ASR even when the mixture SNR is as low as -60 dB. (ii) The difference between the LC and the mixture SNR is more correlated to the recognition accuracy than LC. (iii) The performance profiles in ASR are qualitatively similar to those obtained for human speech recognition. (iv) The LC at which the peak performance is obtained is lower than 0 dB, which is the optimal threshold as far as the SNR gain of processed signals is concerned. This indicates that maximizing SNR gain may not be the optimal criterion to improve either human or machine recognition of noisy speech.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
