
handle: 10419/34247 , 10419/322713 , 10419/153212
In a perfect labor market severance payments can have no real effects as they can be undone by a properly designed labor contract (Lazear 1990). We give empirical content to this proposition by estimating the effects of EPL on entry wages and on the tenure-wage profile in a quasi-experimental setting. We consider a reform that introduced unjust-dismissal costs in Italy for firms below 15 employees, leaving firing costs unchanged for bigger firms. Estimates which account for the endogeneity of the treatment status due to workers and firms sorting around the 15 employees threshold show no effect of the reform on entry wages and a decrease of the returns to tenure by around 20% in the first year and by 8% over the first two years. We interpret these findings as broadly consistent with Lazear's (1990) prediction that firms make workers prepay the severance cost.
Costs of Unjust Dismissals, Severance Payments, Regression Discontinuity Design, Severance Payments, Arbeitsverhältnis, J65, ddc:330, Lohn, Costs of Unjust Dismissals, Abfindung, Costs of Unjust Dismissals, Regression Discontinuity Design, Severance Payments, Arbeitsmobilität, Beschäftigungssystem, Regression Discontinuity Design, E24, J63, Arbeitnehmerschutz, Theorie, jel: jel:J65, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J63
Costs of Unjust Dismissals, Severance Payments, Regression Discontinuity Design, Severance Payments, Arbeitsverhältnis, J65, ddc:330, Lohn, Costs of Unjust Dismissals, Abfindung, Costs of Unjust Dismissals, Regression Discontinuity Design, Severance Payments, Arbeitsmobilität, Beschäftigungssystem, Regression Discontinuity Design, E24, J63, Arbeitnehmerschutz, Theorie, jel: jel:J65, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J63
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
