
handle: 10419/56326
SummaryThe paper reviews and evaluates some recent contributions on modeling entrepreneurship within a neoclassical framework, analyzing how, and to what extent, the fundamental ingredients suggested in the social science literature were captured. It is shown how these approaches are important in stressing the main elements of a complex picture, without being able to fully describe it. Each modeling attempt focuses only on one specific feature of entrepreneurship, and the entrepreneurial function, broadly perceived, eludes analytical tractability. As a consequence, the models can be useful in analyzing the effect of entrepreneurial behavior at an aggregate level, but not at explaining individual choices. From these observations, it is highlighted how a simplistic interpretation of the existing mainstream approaches incorporating entrepreneurship runs the risk of leading to distortionary policy interventions.
L23, O31, M13, Neoklassik, ddc:330, J23, Entrepreneurship, Uncertainty, D81, B41, Neoclassical Modeling, Entrepreneurship-Ansatz, Innovation, Entrepreneurial Choice; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Neoclassical Modeling; Uncertainty, Theorie, Entrepreneurial Choice, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:B41, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:L23, jel: jel:J23, jel: jel:M13
L23, O31, M13, Neoklassik, ddc:330, J23, Entrepreneurship, Uncertainty, D81, B41, Neoclassical Modeling, Entrepreneurship-Ansatz, Innovation, Entrepreneurial Choice; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Neoclassical Modeling; Uncertainty, Theorie, Entrepreneurial Choice, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:B41, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:L23, jel: jel:J23, jel: jel:M13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 82 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
