
AbstractIn this paper, I estimate the ex ante or intentional cyclical stance of fiscal policy in OECD countries. I use the fiscal plans reported at the time of budgeting, together with other information available to fiscal policy‐makers in real time. Indeed, fiscal plans might be significantly different from ex post outcomes because governments do not have complete control over their implementation, which is influenced by several exogenous factors. When fiscal‐policy rules are estimated using real‐time data, I show in this paper that OECD countries have often planned a counter‐cyclical fiscal stance, especially during economic expansions. This contrasts with conventional findings based on actual data, which tend to point towards a‐cyclicality or pro‐cyclicality. Forecast errors for the government structural balance and the output gap play a central role in explaining the differences between estimates based on ex ante and ex post data.
ddc:330, endogenous threshold models, Fiscal Policy, real-time data, revision errors, Informationsversorgung, Finanzpolitik, revision errors, endogenous threshold models, OECD-Staaten, Fiscal Policy, Politische Entscheidung, Fiscal policy;Cyclical stabilization;Real-time data;Revision errors;Endogenous threshold models, H30, E62, real-time data, E30, H60, C23, Schätzung, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:H30, jel: jel:E30
ddc:330, endogenous threshold models, Fiscal Policy, real-time data, revision errors, Informationsversorgung, Finanzpolitik, revision errors, endogenous threshold models, OECD-Staaten, Fiscal Policy, Politische Entscheidung, Fiscal policy;Cyclical stabilization;Real-time data;Revision errors;Endogenous threshold models, H30, E62, real-time data, E30, H60, C23, Schätzung, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:H30, jel: jel:E30
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 92 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
