
handle: 10419/25991 , 10419/214380
Abstract A common political claim is that decentralized governments undermine policy-makers' ability to resist fiscal imbalance. This paper examines how fiscal centralization influences the likelihood of a successful fiscal adjustment. Using a panel of Swiss cantons from 1981 to 2001, we empirically investigate the determinants of successful long-lasting deficit reductions. Contrary to some results in the literature, we find that fiscal centralization significantly decreases the probability of a successful fiscal consolidation when the contravening effects of competitive and cooperative federalism are disentangled. The results also point to an important role of the economic environment, in particular the size of the primary balance in the years before the consolidation, in determining whether adjustment policy is successful.
Finanzföderalismus, fiscal adjustment, consolidation policy, fiscal decentralization, fiscal institutions, fiscal institutions, Fiscal Adjustment, Consolidation Policy, Fiscal Adjustment; Consolidation Policy; Fiscal Decentralization; Fiscal Institutions, consolidation policy, Schweiz, Fiscal Institutions, fiscal decentralization, ddc:330, fiscal adjustment, Fiscal Decentralization, E61, Haushaltskonsolidierung, E63, H61, Erfolgsfaktor, Schätzung, jel: jel:E61, jel: jel:E63, jel: jel:H61
Finanzföderalismus, fiscal adjustment, consolidation policy, fiscal decentralization, fiscal institutions, fiscal institutions, Fiscal Adjustment, Consolidation Policy, Fiscal Adjustment; Consolidation Policy; Fiscal Decentralization; Fiscal Institutions, consolidation policy, Schweiz, Fiscal Institutions, fiscal decentralization, ddc:330, fiscal adjustment, Fiscal Decentralization, E61, Haushaltskonsolidierung, E63, H61, Erfolgsfaktor, Schätzung, jel: jel:E61, jel: jel:E63, jel: jel:H61
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
