
handle: 10419/34026 , 10419/144304
This paper investigates inter-industry wage differentials in Belgium, taking advantage of access to a unique matched employer-employee data set covering the period 1995-2002. Findings show the existence of large and persistent wage differentials among workers with the same observed characteristics and working conditions, employed in different sectors. The hypothesis that workers with better unmeasured abilities are over-represented in high-wage sectors may not be rejected on the basis of Martins’ (2004) methodology. However, the contribution of this explanation to the observed industry wage differentials appears to be limited. Further results show that ceteris paribus, workers earn significantly higher wages when employed in more profitable firms. Our instrumented wage-profit elasticity stands at 0.063 and Lester’s range of pay is about 41 per cent of the mean wage. This rent-sharing phenomenon accounts for a large fraction of the industry wage differentials. We find indeed that the magnitude, dispersion and significance of industry wage differentials decreases sharply when controlling for profits.
Quantile regressions, Lohnstruktur, Belgien, Lohn, ddc:330, Industrielohn, Matched employer-employee data, Industry wage differentials, Lohndifferenzierung, Unobserved heterogeneity, Industry wage differentials; Unobserved heterogeneity; Rent-sharing; Matched employer-employee data; Quantile regressions, J41, J31, Rent-sharing, D31, Schätzung, jel: jel:D31, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J41
Quantile regressions, Lohnstruktur, Belgien, Lohn, ddc:330, Industrielohn, Matched employer-employee data, Industry wage differentials, Lohndifferenzierung, Unobserved heterogeneity, Industry wage differentials; Unobserved heterogeneity; Rent-sharing; Matched employer-employee data; Quantile regressions, J41, J31, Rent-sharing, D31, Schätzung, jel: jel:D31, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J41
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
