
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.900427
Defined benefit pension plans experienced serious difficulties at the beginning of this new century. In our opinion, the stock market performance contributed only partly to this situation. More important is the poor choice of benchmarks used in risk and performance control. In this paper, we propose a more suitable benchmark and an attribution model for evaluating the investment performance of pension funds. The benchmark in this paper implies a clear choice for the reliability of the future pension claims. We emphasize the importance of making a distinction between nominal and real liabilities for pension funds. The investment strategy of a pension fund should be based on assets that matching the risk characteristics with its liabilities. We propose a portfolio of assets that is cash flow matched with the real liabilities and one matched with the nominal liabilities. In addition, we have a third portfolio, which is the portfolio of surplus assets that can be freely invested.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
