
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.892737
handle: 10419/22006 , 10419/19140 , 10523/883
This paper examines the link between a firm's owership of productive assets and its choice of foreign-market entry strategy. We find that, controlling for industry- and country-specific characteristics, the most productive firms (i.e., those owning the most assets) will enter through greenfield investment, less productive ones will choose M&A, and the least productive ones will export. In addition, the most productive firms are shown to prefer whole ownership to a joint venture. These predictions are confirmed in an econometric analysis of Japanese firm-level data.
Multinationales Unternehmen, productivity, foreign direct investment, foreign direct investment, merger and acquisition, joint venture, greenfield investment, firm heterogeneity, productivity, 338, greenfield investment, Internationale Markteintrittsstrategie, joint venture, Japan, F12, HB Economic Theory, ddc:330, F15, Direktinvestition, Foreign direct investment,merger and acquisition,joint venture,greenfield investment,firm heterogeneity,productivity, merger and acquisition, firm heterogeneity, Produktivität, Foreign direct investment, Betriebsvermögen, Theorie, Schätzung, jel: jel:F12, jel: jel:F15
Multinationales Unternehmen, productivity, foreign direct investment, foreign direct investment, merger and acquisition, joint venture, greenfield investment, firm heterogeneity, productivity, 338, greenfield investment, Internationale Markteintrittsstrategie, joint venture, Japan, F12, HB Economic Theory, ddc:330, F15, Direktinvestition, Foreign direct investment,merger and acquisition,joint venture,greenfield investment,firm heterogeneity,productivity, merger and acquisition, firm heterogeneity, Produktivität, Foreign direct investment, Betriebsvermögen, Theorie, Schätzung, jel: jel:F12, jel: jel:F15
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
