
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.890455
We present fresh evidence on the validity of the dividend signaling hypothesis (DSH), by using a new testing approach. Using a simple dividend signaling model, we derive three empirically identifiable drivers of the marginal net benefit of signaling: cash flow predictability, market-to-book ratio, and past equity returns. Our empirical tests support the DSH. There is a significantly greater association between current dividend changes and future earnings performance for firms with low cash flow predictability, low market-to-book ratio, and low past equity returns. We also present evidence that the marginal signaling benefits at the firm-level are time-varying, increasing (decreasing) in booms (recessions) and in periods of high (low) aggregate stock market performance.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
