
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.889509
handle: 10419/19121
Trust games are employed to investigate the effect of heterogeneity in income and race on cooperation in South Africa. The amount of socio-economic information available to the subjects about their counterparts is varied. No significant behavioural differences are observed, when no such information is provided. However, when the information is available, it significantly affects individual trust behaviour. The low income subjects from both racial groups invest significantly less in partnerships with the high income subjects of the other racial group than in any other partnership. We attribute this behaviour to cross-racial envy, which on aggregate may lead to substantial underinvestment in the economy.
south africa, Vertrauen, Spieltheorie, income distribution, cooperation, ethnic groups, trust game, ethnic diversity, income inequality, cooperation, cross cultural studies, Experiment, socioeconomics, race relations, Kooperation, C91, Südafrika, war, Institutional and Behavioral Economics,, J15, ddc:330, human behaviour, Investition, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities, ethnic diversity, economic development, Einkommensverteilung, trust game, SDG 1 - No Poverty, ethnicity, Ethnische Beziehungen, Theorie, income inequality
south africa, Vertrauen, Spieltheorie, income distribution, cooperation, ethnic groups, trust game, ethnic diversity, income inequality, cooperation, cross cultural studies, Experiment, socioeconomics, race relations, Kooperation, C91, Südafrika, war, Institutional and Behavioral Economics,, J15, ddc:330, human behaviour, Investition, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities, ethnic diversity, economic development, Einkommensverteilung, trust game, SDG 1 - No Poverty, ethnicity, Ethnische Beziehungen, Theorie, income inequality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
