<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10419/60661
This paper suggests that the US recovery from the Great Depression was driven by a shift in expectations. This shift was caused by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's policy actions. On the monetary policy side, Roosevelt abolished the gold standard and—even more importantly—announced the explicit objective of inflating the price level to pre-Depression levels. On the fiscal policy side, Roosevelt expanded real and deficit spending, which made his policy objective credible. These actions violated prevailing policy dogmas and initiated a policy regime change as in Sargent (1983) and Temin and Wigmore (1990). The economic consequences of Roosevelt are evaluated in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with nominal frictions. (JEL D84, E52, E62, N12, N42)
Dynamisches Gleichgewicht, Geldpolitik, Mikroökonomische Fundierung, ddc:330, Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik, Depressions ; Gold standard ; Price levels ; Rational expectations (Economic theory) ; Economic policy, Finanzpolitik, Diskretionäre Politik, deflation, Great Depression, regime change, zero interest rates, E52, E63, USA, jel: jel:D84, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:N42, jel: jel:N12
Dynamisches Gleichgewicht, Geldpolitik, Mikroökonomische Fundierung, ddc:330, Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik, Depressions ; Gold standard ; Price levels ; Rational expectations (Economic theory) ; Economic policy, Finanzpolitik, Diskretionäre Politik, deflation, Great Depression, regime change, zero interest rates, E52, E63, USA, jel: jel:D84, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:N42, jel: jel:N12
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 219 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |