Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Is Minimum Variance Hedging Necessary for Equity Indices? A Study of Hedging and Cross-Hedging Exchange Traded Funds

Authors: Carol Alexander; Andreza Barbosa;

Is Minimum Variance Hedging Necessary for Equity Indices? A Study of Hedging and Cross-Hedging Exchange Traded Funds

Abstract

This paper investigates the optimal short-term hedging of Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) portfolios with index futures. Using daily data from May 2000 to December 2004 on the four largest passive ETFs (the Spider, the Diamond, the Cubes and the Russell iShare) and their corresponding index futures we examine the performance of minimum variance hedges for efficient variance reduction and for investors with exponential utility. Our findings relate to daily hedging based on OLS regression, exponentially weighted moving averages and ECM-GARCH models and the utility-based performance evaluation criterion is adopted to capture an efficient reduction in skewness and kurtosis as well as the variance. The basis risk on US equity indices is now extremely low and as a result we find no evidence that minimum variance hedge ratios outperform a naive 1:1 futures hedge, either for individual ETFs or for portfolios of ETFs. Where minimum variance hedge ratios are useful is for the cross-hedging of ETFs, i.e., the netting of long-short positions prior to placing a futures hedge. We also find that hedging of an ETF portfolio with just one index future can be almost as effective as hedging with all the relevant index futures. Our results should be of interest to tax arbitrage investors in ETFs and their market makers, who often face large and heterogeneous creation and redemption demands on different ETFs. Both types of traders may consider hedging their positions overnight or over a few days.

Keywords

Exchange Traded Fund, Hedging, Minimum Variance, Utility, jel: jel:G15, jel: jel:C32, jel: jel:G10

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!