
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.849011
This paper sets up a model to inquire into whether the rise and fall in barter transactions in Russia and other CIS countries during the 1990's was an involuntary decision resulting from credit rationing or the consequence of firms' optimal choice. We find that the transmission mechanism of the government policy contains the necessary information to answer the question. An inquiry into the empirics of the model is then conducted using data from Russia.
Barter, Interest rate, Credit rationing, Optimal choice, jel: jel:E0, jel: jel:E4, jel: jel:P26, jel: jel:E5, jel: jel:F41, jel: jel:P24
Barter, Interest rate, Credit rationing, Optimal choice, jel: jel:E0, jel: jel:E4, jel: jel:P26, jel: jel:E5, jel: jel:F41, jel: jel:P24
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
