
Contrary to accepted belief, the standard Tobit maximum likelihood estimator produces inconsistent parameter estimates, when the constant censoring threshold c is non-zero and unknown. Unfortunately the recording of a zero rather than the actual censoring threshold value is typical of economic data. Non-trivial minimum purchase prices for most goods, fixed cost for doing business or trading, social customs such as those involving charitable donations, and informal administrative recording practices represent common examples of non-zero censoring threshold where the threshold is not readily available to the econometrician. Monte Carlo results show that this bias can be extremely large in practice. A new estimator is proposed to estimate the unknown censoring threshold. It is shown that the estimator is superconsistent and follows an exponential distribution in large samples. Statistical tests for the censoring threshold are introduced. A simulation study shows that the finite sample size and power properties of the proposed tests are encouraging.
order statistics, Censored data models, threshold determination, Monte Carlo methods, exponential distribution, maximum likelihood, kernel density estimates, Applications of statistics to economics, Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators, Parametric hypothesis testing
order statistics, Censored data models, threshold determination, Monte Carlo methods, exponential distribution, maximum likelihood, kernel density estimates, Applications of statistics to economics, Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators, Parametric hypothesis testing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 90 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
