
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.7139279
How effective are compliant mechanisms for force transmission? We explore here how their inherent elastic deformation limits, or does not, their ability to transmit forces; and analyze their elastokinematic behavior to quantify, understand, and interpret the transmission of forces. Towards quantification, mathematically tractable definitions of mechanical advantage (MA) are explored. By relating MA to the mechanism's stiffness parameters, we analyze its dependence on actuator and workpiece characteristics. By decomposing MA into components that account for cumulative and instantaneous force transmission, we examine how compliance can be effectively leveraged to achieve favorable force transmission. Furthermore, based on the reciprocity between displacement advantage and MA, we conclude that compliant mechanisms are equally capable of force transmission as they are of motion transmission. Additionally, we discuss method for visualizing force transmission using the mechanism's static eigenmode shapes. Derived results are elucidated through examples of compliant crimping and 4-bar mechanisms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
