Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Geology-Guided Variational Bayesian Mixture of Experts for AVA Inversion

Authors: Zilu Fu; Yong Li; Yingtian Liu; Junheng Peng;

Geology-Guided Variational Bayesian Mixture of Experts for AVA Inversion

Abstract

Traditional task-oriented learning for pre-stack AVA inversion typically adopts a single-network architecture to handle all elastic parameters. This practice introduces two inherent limitations. First, it struggles to accommodate spatial variations in lithofacies because a single global mapping cannot satisfy the distinct elastic-parameter distributions of different rock types. Second, its outputs may violate petrophysical trends since the elastic parameters are predicted independently. To relieve these limitation, we propose a Variational Bayesian Mixture of Implicitly Localized Experts (VB-MILE) network. We derive two geological priors from the latent facies distribution. One is a lithofacies-conditional elastic-parameter prior from a well-log Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). This prior constrains each expert's output means and covariances to match the facies-specific statistics observed in well logs. The other is a spatial assignment prior obtained by aligning a low-frequency GMM with the well-log GMM. This prior initializes the gating network and regularizes its dynamic expert assignment via KL divergence. Both priors are integrated into a unified variational Bayesian framework, enabling a divide-and-conquer strategy. In this strategy, different experts specialize in different lithofacies, and the gating network assigns each spatial location to the appropriate expert. The network is trained semi-supervisedly using sparse well logs and abundant unlabeled data to improve generalization. Experiments on the Marmousi2 dataset and field data from the Tahe Oilfield (Xinjiang, China) demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms conventional data-driven approaches in both accuracy and geological plausibility.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!