Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Logging Legacies in the Australian Tropics: 56-Years of Skid Trail Recovery

Authors: Alexandra A. Catling; V.D. Derisso; L.ED. Gamalo; John Herbohn; C.L. McRae; M.G. Mooney; Jenny Vivian; +1 Authors

Logging Legacies in the Australian Tropics: 56-Years of Skid Trail Recovery

Abstract

Given continued selective timber harvests from >500 million ha of tropical forest, forest managers need to know about its short and long-term avoidable and unavoidable consequences. Here we focus on long-term ecological impacts from an unavoidable disturbance, the soil and vegetation damage on skid trails used for log extraction. We studied recovery of main skid trails in the Australian Wet Tropics 56-years after 86 m3/ha (18 trees/ha) were harvested with bulldozers. Due to use of what are now known as reduced-impact logging practices, the main skid trails covered only 3.9% of the surface area and were mostly on ridge tops. Soil bulk density fully recovered since logging, and small-statured vegetation was denser and vertebrates more common on skid trails than in adjacent forest. Most animal activity on skid trails was by feral pigs (Sus scrofa), where predatory beetles were also scarcer and less diverse than in adjacent forest. The most prominent logging legacy was the absence of trees >20 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) on main skid trails, with basal areas half those of adjacent forest. Skid trails commonly supported ferns and sedges, and saplings that declined in density with skid traffic intensity, but there were no pioneers, invasive plants, lianas, or terrestrial bryophytes. Terrestrial LiDAR scans confirmed slow recovery of upper-story vegetation and higher mid- and lower-story densities on skid trails. Given the permanence of main skid trails, emphasis is needed on their planning, use, and closure to maximise the conservation contributions from managed tropical forests.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!