
Extending Milgrom and Roberts (1982) we present an infinite horizon entry model, where the incumbent(s) may use the current price to signal its strength to deter entry. We show that, due to the importance of entrants' types on the post-entry duopoly/oligopoly profits, the incumbent(s) may want to signal its weakness to invite entry of weaker firms.
Limit Pricing, Dynamic Signaling, Entry Deterrence, Dynamic Signaling, Limit Pricing, Entry Deterrence, jel: jel:L11, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D42, jel: jel:D43
Limit Pricing, Dynamic Signaling, Entry Deterrence, Dynamic Signaling, Limit Pricing, Entry Deterrence, jel: jel:L11, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D42, jel: jel:D43
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
