
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6667258
<span><span>A menudo se trata al mercado como un conjunto de datos históricos esperando ser predichos.</span><span>Este artículo propone un cambio de paradigma: tratar la selección de activos como</span><span>un problema de maximización de utilidad. A través de la analogía de la elección de una</span><span>pizza, exploramos cómo los factores de Calidad, Valor y Momentum se entrelazan con el</span><span>Valor Esperado (EV) y la Teoría de Juegos. No buscamos predecir el futuro, sino calcular la</span><span>probabilidad de éxito en una mesa donde cada jugador intenta explotar la utilidad del otro.</span></span>
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
