
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.66389
I show that if one is only interested in local results ~ that is, theorems about what is true at a state ~ which only depend on finitely many orders of beliefs about beliefs, then the common prior assumption is essentially irrelevant. More precisely, given any model where priors have the same support and any finite N, there is another model with common priors which has the same n th order beliefs for all n N. In this sense, priors with the same support are (locally) approximately common.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
