
We examine whether firm-level political risk increases stock price crash risk and whether this effect varies with firms’ political orientation. Using a large sample of U.S. publicly traded firms over 18 years, we find that political risk significantly increases crash risk, with strong heterogeneity across firms. The effect is larger for firms led by Republican-leaning managers, firms with conservative financial policies, and firms in Republican-favored industries. We also show that the effect is stronger among low-liquidity firms, consistent with information asymmetry and bad-news hoarding.Overall, the results link political polarization to financial instability and highlight the role ofideology and information quality in shaping extreme downside risk.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
