
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6602379
Manual checking of BIM information requirements before asset handover remains a labor-intensive, error-prone, and weakly traceable bottleneck in BIM-enabled digital twin workflows. This study presents an automated pre-handover validation workflow for sensor information requirements in municipal wastewater treatment plants based on extended-aeration activated sludge, replacing a manual BIM information-checking task in BIM-to-AIM delivery. The method instantiates purpose-driven requirements through the Level of Information Need, compiles them into executable Information Delivery Specification (IDS) rules, and verifies completeness, controlled vocabularies, and logical consistency before asset information model (AIM) delivery. It generates two validation outputs: a human-readable Validation Report and a machine-readable IDS. In a representative run, the workflow processed 236 requirements, detected 33 inconsistencies (14.0%), and completed core validation in 109.4 ms with SHA-256 traceability. Replication across 15 additional matrices totaling 21,830 requirements confirmed replicability across heterogeneous requirement sets and supported auditable BIM-to-AIM handover for digital twin readiness in critical water infrastructure.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
