Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Sedimentological characteristics of Paleogene-Neogene fluvial and alluvial fan systems in the onshore portion of Campos Basin, Brazil: Insights from Emborê and Barreiras Formations

Authors: Pamela Cardoso Vilela; Claudio Limeira Mello; Thiago Carelli; Josiane Plantz; Leonardo Borghi;

Sedimentological characteristics of Paleogene-Neogene fluvial and alluvial fan systems in the onshore portion of Campos Basin, Brazil: Insights from Emborê and Barreiras Formations

Abstract

This study seeks to reduce gaps in the sedimentological and stratigraphic understanding of the onshore portion of the Campos Basin (Brazil) through lithofacies analysis and paleoenvironmental interpretation of the Emborê and Barreiras formations based on the 2-JU-1-RJ drill core, the second stratigraphic well drilled in the Paraíba do Sul River Deltaic Complex (CDRPS). These units remain the focus of ongoing debate within the geoscientific community regarding their stratigraphic framework and associated depositional paleoenvironments. Eight lithofacies and three lithofacies successions (LS1–LS3) were identified and described, representing alluvial-fan and fluvial depositional systems. The Emborê Formation (São Tomé Member) comprises distal alluvial-fan deposits (LS1), overlain by sandy braided-river deposits with contributions from debris flows and mudflows (LS2). The Barreiras Formation is represented by sandy braided fluvial deposits characterized by episodic channel drowning and postdepositional sediment modification (LS3). From a sedimentological perspective, the Emborê Formation exhibits strong affinities with deposits of the Resende Formation (Resende and Volta Redonda basins) and the Rio Doce Formation (Espírito Santo Basin), both of which are attributed to the Eocene–Oligocene period. In contrast, the Barreiras Formation exhibits a sedimentary record comparable to that described in outcrops from the onshore sectors of the Campos and Espírito Santo basins.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!