
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6553778
This paper explores what a quantitative trading algorithm is, and how one can be developed and evaluated through statistical models and simulations. <div> This independent research paper is exploratory and aims to create a basic understanding of how different models perform in practice. It is not to present a finished trading strategy. The historical price data for which the developed algorithms are based on is S&P 500 index fund (SPY) from 2021-2026. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> The five versions of the trading algorithms were developed and evaluated in Python. Each version introduced new tools, from basic market trends to an AI-driven sentiment analysis. The results show that model performance varies significantly through different market conditions, highlighting the importance of flexibility in an algorithm. <div> <br> </div> <div> The final model achieved a Sharpe ratio of 3.32 and a maximum drawdown of 5.43%. These results are promising but should be interpreted with caution. These models have only been tested on historical data, and historical performance can never be used as a guarantee for future outcomes. </div> </div>
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
