
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6507778
Geopolitics as a concept has been diluted over the years, often being used synonymously with modern international relations. Such passive usage results in definitional tergiversation and ambiguity, raising concerns about its analytical utility. While it is argued that there should be a return to classical geopolitical thought in order to re-centre the ‘geo’ in politics, since geography remains an indispensable instrument of statecraft, it operates today through far more complex and layered modalities. Thus, return should not necessarily mean a return to classical determinism, but rather a way to reconceptualise statecraft in more nuanced and multidimensional terms for both analytical and practical purposes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
