Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Random Forest Prediction and Validation of Soil Moisture in Eastern Africa Using ESA CCI SM and ISMN In-Situ Observations

Authors: Zoe Helbing; Jose Antonio Sobrino;

Random Forest Prediction and Validation of Soil Moisture in Eastern Africa Using ESA CCI SM and ISMN In-Situ Observations

Abstract

Structural breaks and reduced ground station coverage have previously limited soil moisture (SM) analyses and validation approaches over Eastern Africa. Due to its high dependence on rain-fed agriculture, it is vital to analyze SM variability and establish reliable monitoring frameworks for the region. Despite improvements in satellite data availability, comprehensive regional analyses and product comparison remain sparse. Therefore, this paper compares the four European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture (ESA CCI SM) datasets (active: scatterometer; passive: radiometer; combined: sensor fusion; gap-filled: interpolation) from 1991-2023 and develops predictive Random Forest (RF) machine learning (ML) models using climate and environmental variables. The models are spatially cross-validated, as well as evaluated against 45 International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) in-situ stations across Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, and Sudan. Spatial cross-validation reveals that the active and combined models perform best (R 2 : 0.57/0.59), with vegetation optical depth (VOD), precipitation, and seasonality being the most important predictors. Validation to ISMN displays moderate positive correlations and small errors for all models (R: 0.59-0.65, RMSE: 0.07-0.1 m³/m³), with the highest correlations recorded for subsurface measurements (R: 0.6-0.67, 10-20 cm below surface). This demonstrates the suitability of ESA CCI SM products for the region and expands model utility beyond surface SM monitoring. Future model applications include climate scenario studies or seasonality and predictor analyses.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!