Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Taphonomic and Mineralogic Evidence for an Organic Composition of Ediacaran Cloudina and Sinotubulites

Authors: Xinjie Wang; Ben Yang;

Taphonomic and Mineralogic Evidence for an Organic Composition of Ediacaran Cloudina and Sinotubulites

Abstract

With special tubular and skeletal bauplan, Ediacaran tubular fossils are one unique metazoan group that has irreplaceable significance for our understanding of the early metazoan evoution. However, their biological affinities have long been disputed because of their limited morphological features and ambiguous primary composition. In all the recorded taxa, this problem typically existed with Cloudina and Sinotubulites, the two most important tubular fossils which have stratigraphic and evolutionary significances. Here we carried out a detailed study on their microstructure, mineralogical composition and taphonomic background, for the purposes of revealing their taphonomic characteristics and biomineralogical potentials which may shed light on the understanding of their phylogenetic affinities. Phosphatic and calcitic specimens from the Yangtze Block, Namibia, and Paraguay were studied using integrative approaches including EBSD, Raman spectroscopy, and cathodoluminescence. It was revealed that, excluding the influence of diagenesis, crystal orientations in all studied Cloudina and Sinotubulites lack an ordered alignment which are commonly seen in biomineralization processes. In most specimens, the luminescence between the surrounded rocks and the fossils showed no diagenetic related differentiation, indicating no traces of original carbonatization. Besides, Raman spectroscopy analysis showed intense carbon within the parallel laminae of tube walls in contrast to the surrounding rocks among both phosphatic and carbonatic taphono-facies preserved which may be residue of original organic matters. These analyses altogether suggest that the original tube-wall composition of both Cloudina and Sinotubulites was likely organic with no detectable traces of primary biomineralization.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!