
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6447340
Environmental reporting requires explaining what happened during manufacturing, including how materials were used, handled, and managed. In many facilities, the information needed to prepare these reports already exists in facility data systems, but it is not always organized in a way that makes reporting simple. This paper reflects the perspective of a late-career environmental regulator reasoning forward from post-retirement study and curiosity rather than from system design experience. The focus is on information flow, traceability, and workload rather than regulatory enforcement or environmental outcomes. Where event records exist, environmental reports may be clearer and less burdensome if they connect directly to those records. For ease of reference, this approach is described here as eventreferenced environmental reporting. The discussion may be useful to facilities, regulators, and others who rely on reported environmental information. Environmental reporting can be grounded in identifiable events.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
