
The paper confronts a key implication of the precautionary model of saving/consumption, using micro-data on British households. The results provide support for the key proposition that job insecurity a.ects consumption. A one standard deviation increase in unemployment risk for the head of household is estimated to reduce consumption by 2.7 per cent. This e.ect is greater for the young, those without non-labour income and manual workers-for whom precautionary e.ects might be expected to be stronger a priori. Consumer durables purchases are also found to be inversely related to unemployment risk
Consumption, precautionary saving, job insecurity, jel: jel:E21, jel: jel:D12
Consumption, precautionary saving, job insecurity, jel: jel:E21, jel: jel:D12
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 108 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
