Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The techno-economics of hydrogen for steelworks: Hydrogen gas or hydrogen carriers?

Authors: H. Aditiya; T.M.I. Mahlia; Zhenguo Huang;

The techno-economics of hydrogen for steelworks: Hydrogen gas or hydrogen carriers?

Abstract

This work studies large-scale hydrogen-based decarbonisation pathways for blast furnace basic oxygen furnaces (BF-BOF) used in steel sector with the conventional fossil configuration as the benchmark. Direct use of hydrogen gas and hydrogen carrier options, namely ammonia and methanol, were assessed using customised techno-economic frameworks that incorporate storage and dehydrogenation requirements. The results show distinct energy demand patterns: direct hydrogen integration imposes a substantial electrical load due to compression and cryogenic cooling, without increasing thermal demand relative to the benchmark. In contrast, while carrier-based systems pose a lower electrical burden, additional thermal input of up to 0.85 GJ/tonne crude steel is required for cracking or reforming. Further analyses of sensitivity, stochastic, and profitability collectively indicate that hydrogen carriers represent the most commercially robust pathway, with median levelised costs around USD 513/tonne crude steel. Moreover, ammonia and methanol in BF-BOF steelmaking can yield investment returns that approach those of conventional BF-BOF under realistic steel price conditions. From an environmental perspective, hydrogen and ammonia pathways enable significant reductions in emissions. Nevertheless, ammonia offers a balanced combination of emissions abatement and techno-economic viability. The findings highlight the role of hydrogen carriers as a practical, and economically viable technology for reducing emissions by steel industry.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!