Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Imperative for Economic Evaluation in Psychedelic-assisted Therapies

Authors: Matthew Hicks; Sam Chapman; Nathan Howard; Patricia M. Herman;

The Imperative for Economic Evaluation in Psychedelic-assisted Therapies

Abstract

The resurgence of interest in psychedelic-assisted therapies (PATs) for mental health conditions, such as depression and PTSD, presents a transformative, yet expensive, new treatment avenue. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant therapeutic potential, but the current high out-of-pocket costs pose a significant barrier to equitable access. This commentary argues for the urgent need for comprehensive economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness research in PATs including comparisons to current standards of care. Preliminary cost-effectiveness models are promising, suggesting that while PATs have high initial costs (estimated at $2,000 to over $11,500 per course), they offer potential long-term savings due to self-limited treatment courses and high durability of effects. To validate these models, future research must systematically collect robust real-world data on intervention costs (personnel, drug, facility, etc.), long-term health outcomes (QALYs, remission rates), and broader societal costs and benefits (productivity gains, reduced healthcare utilization). Key opportunities to refine cost-effective delivery include group therapy models and leveraging state-regulated programs (like those in Oregon and Colorado) to conduct impact-focused implementation research more rapidly and less expensively than the conventional FDA-track. This concerted effort is essential to realize the full potential of PATs and ensure their integration into mainstream mental healthcare.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!