
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6320758
<div> Although Alexander Hamilton famously called the American judicial <span>system the least dangerous branch in Federalist No. 78, many legal </span><span>scholars and political scientists in recent years have been troubled by </span><span>the powerful role of the Supreme Court in constitutional interpretation </span><span>and the countermajoritarian difficulty.1 Scholars holding this </span><span>view worry that an unelected Court with the power to declare a legislative </span><span>act or the action of an elected executive unconstitutional subverts </span><span>the will of the prevailing majority. They often share the normative </span><span>orientation of classic legal scholars of judicial review.</span> </div>
Law
Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
