Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cultural distance and the performance of acquired firms: the different effects of cultural distance between the acquirer and the seller versus the cultural distance between the acquirer and the target

Authors: Palitha Konara; Alexander Mohr; Panagiotis Ganotakis;

Cultural distance and the performance of acquired firms: the different effects of cultural distance between the acquirer and the seller versus the cultural distance between the acquirer and the target

Abstract

We suggest that cultural distance exists at two different levels in cross-border acquisitions (CBAs), i.e., between the acquirer and the target and between the acquirer and the seller. Existing research has exclusively examined the effects of the cultural distance between the acquirer and the target (acquirer-target cultural distance), highlighting, for instance, an increase in conflicts and an inferior realization of synergies. In contrast, the potential effects of the cultural distance between the acquirer and the seller (acquirer-seller cultural distance) have not been studied. We find this problematic given that the acquirer-seller cultural distance is likely to affect CBA performance, albeit in a different manner. Specifically, we expect the acquirer-seller cultural distance to have a direct, positive and an indirect, negative performance effect driven by an increase in CBA completion time, i.e., the time between deal announcement and deal completion. Our results based on data on 875 CBAs show that acquirer-target cultural distance has a direct, negative effect on CBA performance. In contrast, acquirer-seller cultural distance has an indirect, negative performance effect (through increasing the completion time) and a direct, positive performance effect, resulting in an overall positive effect on post-acquisition performance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!