
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6295158
We examine whether and which type of AC expertise is associated with risk oversight beyond the financial reporting process. We find that the industry, legal, and combined accounting and industry expertise of the AC are negatively associated with the likelihood of non-GAAP-related securities class action lawsuits. Next, case settlement amounts are lower when ACs have accounting and industry expertise. Combined accounting and industry expertise is also negatively associated with the scrutiny of plaintiffs’ lawyers and ESG incidents and ROA volatility. Finally, firms are more likely to appoint AC members with combined accounting and industry expertise, rather than other types of expertise, following lawsuits. The evidence suggests that audit committees possessing both accounting and industry expertise provide effective oversight across various aspects of corporate risk-taking.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
